Tuesday, 24 March 2026
Solar HQ

AUDACIOUS ACIDIC ARTISTRY II

BY DINESH CHANDRASENA December 12, 2025
  • Views - {{hitsCtrl.values.hits}}
  • Continuing on from last week where the emphasis was on the art/theatre/music critics, who in most cases have no business ‘critiquing’ singing in the shower, or doodling on scratch paper! Let us move further.

     There were times, when singers/song-writers were in many cases, one and the same. The ability to create the words, the emotions, the messaging that came from writing a song, went almost ‘hand-in-hand’ with becoming successful in the music industry. One would, and could collaborate for sure, as did Elton John with Bernie Taupin along with the likes of John Lennon and Paul McCartney, who over the many years created a multitude of memorable mega hit songs. We never expect a single person to be able to do everything, to be able to write, compose, and perform and do so very well. Doing some of it, or being able to do one component well is the least that could be expected. 
    The technological advances that we are eternally grateful for has also given the music industry invaluable boosts in what is doable, and what can be accomplished successfully in a short time. These very same additions have also, unfortunately, given folks with little, very little or no talent the ability to rise to dizzying heights of success through the use of technology as a replacement for ‘talent’. From auto-tune to adjusting voices and overall sound beyond ‘enhancement’ to the point of recreation and re-invention, there are limits to what can be considered technical ‘help’. So, when we have those who cannot hold a tune if their lives depended on it, launching singing careers it is worrisome. Yes, we live in times now where if you “look the part, you can be the part” but that does not replace talent. Just because you are gyrating semi-nude and have your share of perverts who want to salivate over you, doesn’t mean that holding a mike simply makes you a singer. Shall we try to highlight talents? Maybe take a few voice lessons? See if this is even a career that’s right for you, before subjecting yourself to every “critique” valid or not to ridicule your abilities. 
    The same mantra applies to any of the creative fields. Yes, you may love to be ‘theatrical’, and have your close friends and family applauding wildly (they are after all your friends and family!), but that does not a thespian make. The nuances of acting are not a simple area to be able to excel in, and many sadly fall short. I am personally horrified at the wooden horse level stiff, painfully contrived acting that we see from so many on stage and on the screen. Have you seen some of the frightening series on local television? Local film? It is tragic. From the forlorn gazes, to obviously fake laughter, to melodramatic sobbing, to dialog delivered with no emotions, the list goes on and on. Being attractive physically can open the doors to the audition room, and is some cases the bedroom, and unfortunately in many cases the two are one and the same room. Having a director/producer etc.  in your bed or your corner does not a star class actor/actress make! This is a global issue, but fortunately in many other countries if a series or movie includes bad acting, it is cancelled after the pilot episode or the first season, and the movie gets horrendous reviews. Dragging on the agony for multiple seasons and sequels is just being sadistic towards the audiences!

     The hair and makeup teams are also reprimandable, as are the costume designers in many of these visual tragedies. We have discussed repeatedly that using white makeup doesn’t make you look ‘fairer’ it just makes you look ashen at best and ‘in the grave for 6 months’ at worst. The word ‘pretty’ or ‘handsome’ is not the defining factor for star-power. 
    Take the likes of Danny DeVito, Toby McGuire, Simon Helberg, Michael Scott, Mariska Hargitay, Meryl Streep, and Sandra Bullock, they are not your ‘cookie-cutter’ good-looking, but they are all amazing actors with immense skill in their craft. 


    The topic of critiques and curators, those who take on the burden of guiding, collating, choosing and editing what is good/bad/and worse, are also a rarified circle that can be terribly misguided in their perceived powers. There are the super capable few who have a keen eye, and a sense of unbiased viewing that makes their opinions invaluable, and their input golden. There are also those who are the complete opposite, the one-sided, bitter, angered ‘could-have-beens’ who look at everything that anyone creates with a jaded eye, and a tongue dripping with venom. Sadly, this latter category is more prevalent than the previous!
    We also have the ‘white is right’ syndrome, a sickly by-product and leftover bit of rot from the colonial times, where anything said by anyone ‘white’ is deemed of greater value, and thus “correct”.  How many reputed artistic institutions hire their ‘curators’ based on them being ‘white’? many in our part of the world. From ‘artistic directors’ of theatre festivals, to leading galleries, to design institutions, to lead architects on many mega projects, any ‘imported individual’ is seen to be of greater value, than anyone local, who may be many times more qualified and better suited for the position.

    Why? Do we trust ourselves, and our own capabilities so little? Is it the snobbery of “I can afford to get a person from overseas” the guiding or ‘misguiding’ factor? A friend of mine who has a gallery and had hired a person who was a ‘whiter shade of pale’ as the curator and director, when I asked him what her qualifications were, he mumbled and fumbled over his words. I filled in the gaps and said “you mean you hired her because she is white”! Of course, he was not pleased to hear this verbalized but am sure it played a huge, if not key role in her getting the position. Sad facts in our neck of the woods. 
    I think it is time to take a long look inwards, personally and collectively. We can and should highlight the immeasurable amounts of talents we have all around us, from all walks of society, where the true capabilities and results are born from skills. We can all make a decision to ‘tell it like it is’ stop sugar coating and praising rubbish and take the time to shine a spotlight on the deserving. I myself along with my family have always done this, and like it or not, authenticity in opinions, along with skills is a good starting point to make this journey of life more pleasurable.

    Dinesh Chandrasena

    Dinesh Chandrasena International fashion designer and creative director Dinesh Chandrasena obtained a degree in fashion Design from the Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising (FIDM) in Los Angeles in 1996, secured a 6-month internship at Mega-brand Calvin Klein in New York and upon Her return to Los Angeles took over as Principle Designer for the evening wear design house Claire's Collection. This afforded Her the opportunity to design for a core of celebrity clientele, in a tenure that spanned 17 years, including Oscar Winner Halle Berry (for whom Dinesh designed numerous gowns including Her wedding gown), the wardrobe of Oscar Winner Sandra Bullock, and supporting cast of actresses for the film "Miss Congeniality", the gowns for Oscar winner Dame Julie Andrews for “The Princess diaries” along with Miss USA 2007, Miss America 2008 & Miss Universe 2008. She has also designed for actresses Jacqueline Fernandez and Sonakshi Sinha, (whom Dinesh brought to Sri Lanka for the cover shoot of L'Officiel India magazine). Recently She also showcased “Luxury resort swimwear” and a sustainability driven collection at CFW under the “Wraith” label. Dinesh creative directed Miss Intercontinental International 2016, Miss France 2013, Miss China 2014, and Miss India 2014 in collaboration with Cinnamon Hotels and resorts, also for whom She creative styled the 2015 re-branding shoots. Beyond the basic industry perimeters, Dinesh has also spearheaded the Parisian based “Georges Hobeika” brand launch to the Asian region in 2010, which was featured on CNN, and oversaw the designing of Color schemes/Uniforms for Srilankan airlines during the Emirates Airlines management tenure. She is on an advisory capacity at Her Alma Mater FIDM in Los Angeles (for the advanced study program), served as the Academic lead and fashion design Program Coordinator at Raffles design institute (with 23 Campuses in the Asia/Pacific region), and on a cross university capacity judges the final fashion and textile design Collections at the University of Moratuwa. Dinesh also functions as a director at Doubledee publications, and has conducted Design/product development workshops for garment manufacturing conglomerates MAS and Brandix. She is also a board member of Lanka SaluSala and is working on their expansion plans and design development for global markets. Currently She is the Academic Director and head of fashion design at the College of Fashion and Design (CFD) a premier international design education provider, with programs from Milan and London. Read More

    Topics Solar HQ
    READ MORE